Whistleblower: “I Was Fired For Fighting Hospital’s Ties to Medtronic”

Medtronic cardiac stents

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that cardiologist Dr. David Gossman has filed a lawsuit against the hospital where he used to work as assistant director of the cardiac catheterization lab.  His suit claims that he was fired from Lahey Clinic near Boston for complaining about inappropriate ties between his hospital’s senior cardiology staff and the medical device company Medtronic.

Dr. Gossman is seeking damages for defamation and violations of the Massachusetts Healthcare Whistleblower Act, a state law that protects health care providers from retaliation for disclosing problems within health care facilities.

The suit claims that two senior cardiologists at the clinic—Dr. Thomas Piemonte, director of interventional cardiology and the cardiac catheterization lab, and Dr. Richard Nesto, chair of the cardiology department—pressured other doctors at the hospital to increase use of Medtronic products. It alleges that Piemonte earns “substantial yearly income” serving on the Medtronic speakers’ bureau and that Piemonte’s wife has had a “lengthy employment” with Medtronic and holds stock in the company. 

Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based medical device company with sales last year of $14.6 billion, sells the industry’s broadest line of heart valve products, cardiac stents and angioplasty products, drug pumps, inplantable cardiac defibrillators, auto-transfusion equipment and many other medical therapy devices.

The lawsuit claims that Medtronic offered Piemonte and the hospital:

“…access to the CoreValve, a new heart valve that will be in clinical trials in the U.S. soon, predicated on the purchase and increased utilization of other products made by Medtronic.”

It also alleges that Piemonte and Nesto told a new doctor that her low usage of Medtronic stents jeopardized the hospital’s access to cutting-edge medical technologies.

Gossman was fired after voicing ethical objections to these arrangements. He says he was fired on September 8, 2009, shortly after he had attended a lecture about medical ethics at the hospital, where he asked a hypothetical question about the hospital’s ethical position on a situation in which a medical device company approaches a hospital offering access to a new investigational device but predicates access to the device on increased utilization of other products sold by the company. He claims that later that day, Piemonte and Nesto sought negative feedback about him from nursing staff and technicians and used this to get him fired.

Medtronic has been in the news lately, most recently when it warned doctors last month that the batteries in 6,300 of its implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) were inexplicably losing power.  Two years ago, the company had to issue a recall of its ‘Sprint Fidelis’ defibrillator after seven heart patients died, allegedly because the leads on the defibrillator had fractured.  Medtronic later admitted that as many as 13 deaths may have been linked to the faulty leads.

A Medtronic spokesperson responded to Dr. Gossman’s lawsuit:

“We expect that all of our employees adhere to our very strict policies and code of conduct regarding the sale of our products.”

And a spokesperson for Lahey Clinic claimed, of course, that there was no factual basis to the allegations in the lawsuit. He added:

“Lahey has an impeccable record in the area of corporate compliance and holds itself to the very highest ethical standards in the industry. Dr. Gossman repeatedly demonstrated himself to be unsuited to the kind of behavior that characterizes Lahey Clinic. A detailed assessment was made during the summer of 2009 and the conclusion was reached that the severe problems Dr. Gossman had caused in his relationships with colleagues were beyond remedy. As such, the decision that Dr. Gossman and Lahey had to part company was made before the isolated suggestion set forth in his complaint. Dr. Gossman’s isolated suggestion played no part in his conduct-based dismissal from Lahey Clinic.”

Cardiologist Dr. Melissa Shirley-Walton observed about this case:

“I can’t understand why any institution cannot utilize multiple devices from multiple companies and enjoy the benefits of having access to technologies in development from all of them. Let this be a lesson to us all – and I suspect there will be many lessons learned from this particular incident. I’m always sorry to hear about in-fighting among professionals. The patients, who should be our main focus, always lose in the end.”

Read the Wall Street Journal article, or this flattering Lahey Clinic newsletter feature about Dr. Gossman in the good old days, apparently before his ‘severe problems’ were ‘beyond remedy’.

See also: Cardiologists Accused of Implanting Unnecessary Cardiac Stents

7 thoughts on “Whistleblower: “I Was Fired For Fighting Hospital’s Ties to Medtronic”

  1. “Whistle blower”?? Oh c’mon. more like whining. has anyone asked him about all the porn they found on his computer? huh? have they??

    Like

    • RE previous comment: Unless you have access to this person’s private personnel files at Lahey, why would you spread rumors that are irrelevant to the issue? I’ll be following this case carefully to see if the courts agree with the cardiologist’s claim or not.

      It takes a brave (or foolhardy) soul to stand up to a big corporation that is so entrenched in the hospital culture, especially when many of his peers are likely on the take as well, so are very UNlikely to support him at all. I admire him. I’ve seen this practice myself in my own hospital but I’m too much of a coward to rock the boat, jeapardize my research funding, etc. I need this job, especially in this U.S. economy, and just try to keep my eye on the prize – retirement in only 2 years if I can hang on. Maybe then I’ll write a book about what I’ve seen in inappropriate corporate interference.

      Please don’t use my name or contact info, for obvious reasons.

      Like

      • Anon, I can understand your reluctance to come forward with your concerns about your own hospital, but if every potential whistle blower at every hospital where such wrongdoing was occurring were a “coward” (as you describe yourself), it is exactly like giving the crooks carte blanche to do whatever they need to do to make more money thanks to those who stand by and do nothing.

        By the time you retire and write your “Tell All” memoirs, it may be too late. Just a thought.

        Like

    • Cecilia, one might almost think you were a plant supported by the hospital to try to discredit the good doctor wherever possible. Nice try…….

      Like

  2. Pingback: Clinic Geek

    • Hi Furl
      Here’s a March 10, 2010 news report from the Associated Press on this case:

      MEDTRONIC DISCLOSES US ATTORNEY’S PROBE IN MASSACHUSETTS

      WASHINGTON: Medical device maker Medtronic says federal prosecutors are investigating its relationship with cardiologists at a hospital in Massachusetts.

      In regulatory filings with the government, Medtronic said it has been asked to hand over documents to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts. The attorneys are seeking information about Medtronic’s CoreValve division and its relationship with heart specialists at the Lahey Clinic in Burlington, Mass. It did not provide further details of the probe.

      The clinic is a teaching hospital affiliated with the Tufts University School of Medicine.

      Minneapolis-based Medtronic says it will cooperate with the government. It disclosed the investigation in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.”

      Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s