Comments on: PhD in analyzing text messages. Seriously. https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/ Marketing Ethics for the Easily Swayed Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:40:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Carolyn Thomas https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-74564 Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:29:22 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=10818#comment-74564 Apparently. As I said, all the good doctoral thesis topics have already been taken. Hence: texting.

Like

]]>
By: Real PhD https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-74465 Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:15:13 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=10818#comment-74465 This “doctor” spent 80,000 words to tell the world that “the average text contains 17.5 words”. Are you kidding me? This is what academia has devolved into?

Like

]]>
By: Carolyn Thomas https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61633 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:54:21 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=10818#comment-61633 No kidding…😉

Like

]]>
By: The Accidental Amazon https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61632 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:44:45 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=10818#comment-61632 I can think of several legitimate and potentially revealing issues to study about wireless, social media, and online communications, but private texting is not one of them.

Like

]]>
By: Carolyn Thomas https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61605 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:26:37 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=10818#comment-61605 Nice to hear from you again, Dr. Joe. Just be glad that in this case these are England’s taxpayers, not Australian (or Canadian!)

Like

]]>
By: Dr Joe Kosterich https://ethicalnag.org/2013/03/18/phd-in-analyzing-text-messages-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61601 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:13:27 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=10818#comment-61601 Clearly people have too much time on their hands. And the question arises – who pays for this? Oh that’s right, the taxpayer.

Like

]]>