Comments on: Medical journals: “information-laundering for Big Pharma”? https://ethicalnag.org/2012/09/26/medical-journals-information-laundering-big-pharma/ Marketing Ethics for the Easily Swayed Mon, 12 May 2014 13:55:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Carolyn Thomas https://ethicalnag.org/2012/09/26/medical-journals-information-laundering-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-44732 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:13:53 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=9958#comment-44732 In reply to Bev RN.

Hi Bev – everything here is in the public domain and easily accessible to all physicians. When former journal editors themselves start publishing these facts in other journals, it’s all right out there for all to read.

Like

]]>
By: Bev RN https://ethicalnag.org/2012/09/26/medical-journals-information-laundering-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-44713 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:35:04 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=9958#comment-44713 Carolyn, have you investigated as to whether there’s any remotely viable means to get these articles – by you and cited by you – out to physicians? That must be impossible, from a money standpoint, for starters, but I had to ask anyway.

I think about sharing them with my own physicians but amazingly, the first thought that comes to mine is “What will that do to my relationship with that doctor?” If there were only a way to have them mass delivered……

Liked by 1 person

]]>
By: Carolyn Thomas https://ethicalnag.org/2012/09/26/medical-journals-information-laundering-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-44709 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:36:16 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=9958#comment-44709 In reply to Doctor Skeptic.

Excellent point about device makers. I’ve written about orthopedic surgeons here and about neurosurgeons here. And lots about stent-happy cardiologists of course . . . Thanks for your perspective.

Like

]]>
By: Doctor Skeptic https://ethicalnag.org/2012/09/26/medical-journals-information-laundering-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-44696 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:09:42 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=9958#comment-44696 Thanks for continuing to draw people’s attention to this problem. One point I like to make is that the device industry, particularly for surgery, but also for interventionists (stenters etc) is just as bad as the pharmaceutical industry, if not worse, and it often flies under the radar.

Surgeons have their conference fees and flights paid for by companies (nominally by asking everyone who attends to speak for 5 minutes, therefore making them faculty). Device manufacturers now run many of the workshops, and the focus of surgical education is on what device to use and how, with very little discussion of non-operative alternatives.

Not to mention royalties, speakers fees, research funding, fellowship sponsorships, meeting sponsorships, educational dinners, promotional material, ‘badged’ patient information brochures etc.

Liked by 1 person

]]>