Comments on: How to tell if ads are true – courtesy of Wikipedia! https://ethicalnag.org/2011/08/27/how-to-tell-if-ads-are-true-courtesy-of-wikipedia/ Marketing Ethics for the Easily Swayed Mon, 05 Sep 2011 02:10:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Nijinski https://ethicalnag.org/2011/08/27/how-to-tell-if-ads-are-true-courtesy-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-17820 Mon, 05 Sep 2011 02:10:42 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=7064#comment-17820 And what if the little blue numbers refer to journal articles that have been produced by Big Pharma-paid medical ghostwriters and signed off by doctors who falsely take credit for “authorship” to help pad their list of academic publications?

Like

]]> By: Carolyn Thomas https://ethicalnag.org/2011/08/27/how-to-tell-if-ads-are-true-courtesy-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-17433 Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:31:09 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=7064#comment-17433 I wrote about these medical journal retractions last fall after the Nobel Prize-winning cancer researcher Dr. Linda Buck had not one, not two, but THREE of her journal articles retracted. Trouble is, the retracted articles are still being cited in subsequent research papers.
Cheers,
C.

Like

]]> By: Dr Joe https://ethicalnag.org/2011/08/27/how-to-tell-if-ads-are-true-courtesy-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-17409 Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:24:41 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=7064#comment-17409 So true. And this applies even if the little numbers are medical studies, an increasing number of which are being retracted or found to have provided the answer that was paid for.

Like

]]>