Comments on: Nobel prize winner forced to retract three flawed peer-reviewed journal articles http://ethicalnag.org/2010/11/08/linda-buck-retracts-articles/ Marketing Ethics for the Easily Swayed Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:29:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: G Mukherjee http://ethicalnag.org/2010/11/08/linda-buck-retracts-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-8407 Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:07:38 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=3562#comment-8407 The biological system is highly complex and highly diverse which makes some experiments difficult to reproduce.
So if someone unable to reproduce data that means not the published work was wrong. It should not be retracted.

]]> By: Will W.T. http://ethicalnag.org/2010/11/08/linda-buck-retracts-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-8069 Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:08:35 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=3562#comment-8069 Something is clearly very wrong with these peer reviewers if one “researcher” (and I use that word advisedly) can actually get her flawed studies published in journals in the first place – and can now just blame her research assistant. Where does the ‘Buck’ stop?

]]> By: Researching http://ethicalnag.org/2010/11/08/linda-buck-retracts-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-7953 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 05:41:16 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=3562#comment-7953 We have put a link to this article from our website [...] Nobel prize winner forced to retract three flawed peer-reviewed journal articles | The Ethical Nag [...]

]]> By: World Spinner http://ethicalnag.org/2010/11/08/linda-buck-retracts-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-7780 Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:14:56 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=3562#comment-7780 Nobel prize winner forced to retract three flawed peer-reviewed ……

Here at World Spinner we are debating the same thing……

]]>