Comments on: Radiation + asbestos = good. Vaccines + abortions = bad. https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/01/amer-j-phys-surgeons/ Marketing Ethics for the Easily Swayed Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:40:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ugly Americans https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/01/amer-j-phys-surgeons/comment-page-1/#comment-3548 Sun, 16 May 2010 09:50:30 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=679#comment-3548 Hello, interesting stuff. Thought provoking and disturbing at the same time. Thank you!

Like

]]>
By: Anon. https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/01/amer-j-phys-surgeons/comment-page-1/#comment-927 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:53:05 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=679#comment-927 It’s distressing to think that conspiracy theorists and racists disguised as normal physicians are out there disseminating this stuff under the auspices of an officious-sounding journal. Keep up the good work here – I Look forward to reading more from you in the future.

Like

]]>
By: RN in DC https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/01/amer-j-phys-surgeons/comment-page-1/#comment-531 Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:33:35 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=679#comment-531 All these “conspiracies” (“what your doctor does not want you to know”!) are laughable. To think, however, that a bunch of guys with MD degrees are churning out what looks like bona fide medical journals – and that medical practice might actually be affected by this nonsense, is appalling.

It reminds me of an old nurses’ joke at the hospital where I work:
Q: What do you call the med student who graduates at the very bottom of the class?

A: “Doctor”.

Like

]]>
By: Gerard https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/01/amer-j-phys-surgeons/comment-page-1/#comment-295 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:16:26 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=679#comment-295 Pretend medical journals!??! Extremist lobby groups masquerading as professional medical authorities??!?!

This is depressing – how does the average physician tell the difference, unless they read about it here first?!

Like

]]>
By: Office Mgmt News https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/01/amer-j-phys-surgeons/comment-page-1/#comment-109 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:46:50 +0000 http://ethicalnag.org/?p=679#comment-109 Wow – I hadn’t heard of either this so-called journal or the pretend Merck journals (which is worse? Impossible to say!) But I can totally see how doctors would pick up these official-sounding journals and assume they are on the level. If only all doctors were as discriminating as the doctor you quote here.

Like

]]>